NeverRanked · The record

Every claim, on the record.

Each number below came from a question set locked by hash and a dated measurement, with the method documented in full. Each one is tied to the run that produced it. Nothing here is a vibe.

Predicted before measured

The strongest claim is one made before the data exists. This one was committed to a dated, timestamped record first, then measured.

Pre-registered · committed 2026-06-09, before any data existed

Claude would cite Honolulu AC companies' own websites less than 5% of the time. Measured at 2%. The commit timestamp predates the first measurement run. Committed to a dated, timestamped record before the measurement ran.

Wording note, added 2026-09-10. The sentence above is reproduced exactly as committed and is not edited, because editing a pre-registered claim after the result is known would defeat the purpose of pre-registering it. The verb is now known to be wrong: Claude searches nothing and returns no URLs, so it names rather than cites, and the 2% is a share of answers that name the business, not of cited URLs. The prediction and the result are unaffected. See the two-layer correction on the methodology page, dated 2026-09-06.

Pre-registered · committed 2026-09-15, before the measurement window opened · OPEN

Across October 2026, fewer than 10 percent of the pages ranking in classic search's organic top five will also be cited by the AI answer engines asked the same question on the same day. Open. Result due 2026-11-01. We do not know it yet either.

What would make us wrong: Pooled overlap at or above 20 percent means classic ranking and AI citation are substantially the same thing on these questions, and we say so in public.

Disclosure. Exploratory 14-day sample seen 2026-09-15 before committing. Overlap 1.5 to 3.4 percent per engine, on the pre-correction definition of cited_urls. The October window is out of sample and uses the corrected instrument.

The published claims

47 numbers across 11 measurements. Each block names the date it was measured, the hash that locks the question set, and links to the full teardown it came from.

Hawaii consumer banking

Measured 2026-05-26 · question set 48b6c76f... · teardown

Hawaii wealth management

Measured 2026-06-08 · question set ae13579a... · teardown

Honolulu dental practices

Measured 2026-05-26 · question set 5c26fb95... · teardown

Hawaii law firms

Measured 2026-06-08 · teardown

Hawaii CPA firms

Measured 2026-05-26 · question set e677faf3... · teardown

Austin TX CPA firms (cross-geo)

Measured 2026-05-27 · question set 17fec069... · teardown

Honolulu med spas

Measured 2026-06-09 · question set 26851ed8... · teardown

Honolulu HVAC

Measured 2026-06-11 · question set 86b2b18e... · teardown

real_estate_honolulu

Measured 2026-06-19 · question set 628e3d2b... · teardown

hotels_hawaii

Measured 2026-06-21 · question set 45ed5eee... · teardown

agency_us

Measured 2026-08-05 · teardown

Why this page exists

Most marketing claims cannot be checked. These can. Every number above came from a question set locked by hash, on a named date, with the method documented in full at /methodology. A claim tied to a dated, hash-locked run is a different kind of claim than one that is not, and a vendor whose work is not actually measured cannot publish a page like this.

How we measure All teardowns